Common Bill of Lading Discrepancies Under a Letter of Credit (LC)

Common Bill of Lading Discrepancies
Under a Letter of Credit (LC)
Up to 60-70% of documents are found discrepant on first presentation! Understanding common B/L pitfalls is key to smoother trade finance. Data in documents must not conflict with other documents or the LC (UCP 600 Art. 14(d)).
Late Presentation / Shipment
Docs presented >21 days post-shipment or after LC expiry. B/L on-board date might be too old vs. presentation date.
Port Inconsistencies
Port of Loading/Discharge on B/L differs from LC. E.g., "St. Petersburg, Ru." vs. "St. Petersburg, Russia". Conflicts with ports on other documents.
Goods Description Mismatch
B/L goods description can be general but must not conflict with LC. Commercial Invoice requires description to correspond with LC.
Quantity/Weight Conflicts
Quantity or gross weight on B/L differs from invoice, packing list, or draft survey report.
Incorrect Packing Details
Packing description on B/L differs from LC stipulation. (Note: UCP doesn't demand identical wording if meaning is consistent and non-conflicting).
Signatures & Authentication
Unsigned B/Ls or copies. Charter Party B/L signature not compliant with UCP 22(a). On-board notations or alterations not authenticated.
Originals vs. Copies
Presenting B/Ls marked "duplicate" or "triplicate" when originals are required. Only a partial set of original B/Ls presented (e.g., 1/3).
Conflicting Data
Data in B/L conflicts with invoice, packing list, etc., regarding shipment, type, quality, description, or weight. Seal numbers not corresponding (e.g., APL9072496 vs. 9072496 if not clearly same).
Missing Transport Documents
The Bill of Lading itself, or other required transport documents evidencing movement of goods, are not presented.

Comments
Post a Comment